About Me

My Photo
Nick is a manager at WatchGuard Technologies for the Hardware Engineering and Productization team. Prior to WatchGuard, Nick was the lead program manager at F5 Networks where he helped grow the company from a start-up to a over $1B juggernaut. Nick was educated at University of Maryland College Park and City University, where he earned his MBA in 2010.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Great application of Anonymous: Project Alien Life!

The hacker group Anonymous appears to have moved past its role of hacking into government systems. Now the group has supposedly released a video that says "we are not alone." In the coming weeks, they are said to be planning to release evidence of extra terrestrial beings that have been on the planet Earth since the early 1900s. The group's posting said that the "truth" of the aliens are much more intricate than simple UFOs and flying saucers. Apparently within a few days, Anonymous will release information about aliens interacting with mankind. 


The message from the group said, "Greetings citizens of the world. We now have the knowledge of the illuminati and we will share this information with you. We can perceive why those withholding this knowledge are doing so, but completely disagree, with that policy. It is every human's birthright, to be given the truth regarding reality and our place in the universe."


Awesome. When was the last time we had a news release that included the word 'illuminati'?  Too damn long ago if you ask me.  Anonymous goes on to say they realize that many people will not believe the details when they release them.  Others have asserted that this is not the work of Anonymous since it's quite a jump to go from exposing corruption to outing space aliens.  But Aliens! 


I am also wondering about a bunch of stuff in the Weird book series.  I hope they can clear that up, too.


Source: http://www.examiner.com/article/the-hacking-group-anonymous-claims-to-have-info-on-ufo-and-alien-life-or-not




Wednesday, May 2, 2012

The Borgen Project - a day in the life of Clint Borgen


The short (8-min) documentary that KOMO did on Clint Borgen went live yesterday afternoon. Some good shots of The Rainier Club! 

You can view it here (crank your volume):
http://www.komonews.com/younews/149704345.html?vid=a

As these things go, it's a tad heavy on the sappiness, but otherwise a good watch.

Seven community leaders were selected by KOMO 4 viewers and each was featured in a short film. The Top 3 vote-getting films will air at the Seattle International Film Festival this month. If the video on my good friend Clint gets the most votes, $5,000 is donated to The Borgen Project. You can cast your vote here: http://www.komonews.com/younews/97674279.html?contest=vote

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

When You Sign That Donor Card

What do you give up when you check that box on your driver's license?  Answer: more than you think.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269910906351598.html


The last time I renewed my driver's license, the clerk at the DMV asked if she should check me off as an organ donor. I said no. She looked at me and asked again. I said, "No. Just check the box that says, 'I am a heartless, selfish bastard.'"
[ORGANS]Photo Illustration Joel Holland, Gallery Stock (photo)
Doctors don't have to tell you or your relatives what they will do to your body during an organ harvest operation because you'll be dead, with no legal rights.
Becoming an organ donor seems like a win-win situation. Some 3.3 people on the transplant waiting list will have their lives extended by your gift (3.3 is the average yield of solid organs per donor). You're a hero, and at no real cost, apparently.
But what are you giving up when you check the donor box on your license? Your organs, of course—but much more. You're also giving up your right to informed consent. Doctors don't have to tell you or your relatives what they will do to your body during an organ harvest operation because you'll be dead, with no legal rights.
The most likely donors are victims of head trauma (from, say, a car or motorcycle accident), spontaneous bleeding in the head, or an aneurysm—patients who can be ruled dead based on brain-death criteria. But brain deaths are estimated to be just around 1% of the total. Everyone else dies from failure of the heart, circulation and breathing, which leads the organs to deteriorate quickly.
The current criteria on brain death were set by a Harvard Medical School committee in 1968, at a time when organ transplantation was making great strides. In 1981, the Uniform Determination of Death Act made brain death a legal form of death in all 50 states.
The exam for brain death is simple. A doctor splashes ice water in your ears (to look for shivering in the eyes), pokes your eyes with a cotton swab and checks for any gag reflex, among other rudimentary tests. It takes less time than a standard eye exam. Finally, in what's called the apnea test, the ventilator is disconnected to see if you can breathe unassisted. If not, you are brain dead. (Some or all of the above tests are repeated hours later for confirmation.)
Here's the weird part. If you fail the apnea test, your respirator is reconnected. You will begin to breathe again, your heart pumping blood, keeping the organs fresh. Doctors like to say that, at this point, the "person" has departed the body. You will now be called a BHC, or beating-heart cadaver.
Still, you will have more in common biologically with a living person than with a person whose heart has stopped. Your vital organs will function, you'll maintain your body temperature, and your wounds will continue to heal. You can still get bedsores, have heart attacks and get fever from infections.
"I like my dead people cold, stiff, gray and not breathing," says Dr. Michael A. DeVita of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. "The brain dead are warm, pink and breathing."
You might also be emitting brainwaves. Most people are surprised to learn that many people who are declared brain dead are never actually tested for higher-brain activity. The 1968 Harvard committee recommended that doctors use electroencephalography (EEG) to make sure the patient has flat brain waves. Today's tests concentrate on the stalk-like brain stem, in charge of basics such as breathing, sleeping and waking. The EEG would alert doctors if the cortex, the thinking part of your brain, is still active.
But various researchers decided that this test was unnecessary, so it was eliminated from the mandatory criteria in 1971. They reasoned that, if the brain stem is dead, the higher centers of the brain are also probably dead.
But in at least two studies before the 1981 Uniform Determination of Death Act, some "brain-dead" patients were found to be emitting brain waves. One, from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in the 1970s, found that out of 503 patients who met the usual criteria of brain death, 17 showed activity in an EEG.
Even some of the sharpest critics of the brain-death criteria argue that there is no possibility that donors will be in pain during the harvesting of their organs. One, Robert Truog, professor of medical ethics, anesthesia and pediatrics at Harvard Medical School, compared the topic of pain in an organ donor to an argument over "whether it is OK to kick a rock."
But BHCs—who don't receive anesthetics during an organ harvest operation—react to the scalpel like inadequately anesthetized live patients, exhibiting high blood pressure and sometimes soaring heart rates. Doctors say these are simply reflexes.
What if there is sound evidence that you are alive after being declared brain dead? In a 1999 article in the peer-reviewed journal Anesthesiology, Gail A. Van Norman, a professor of anesthesiology at the University of Washington, reported a case in which a 30-year-old patient with severe head trauma began breathing spontaneously after being declared brain dead. The physicians said that, because there was no chance of recovery, he could still be considered dead. The harvest proceeded over the objections of the anesthesiologist, who saw the donor move, and then react to the scalpel with hypertension.
Organ transplantation—from procurement of organs to transplant to the first year of postoperative care—is a $20 billion per year business. Recipients of single-organ transplants—heart, intestine, kidney, liver, single and double lung and pancreas—are charged an average $470,000, ranging from $288,000 for a kidney transplant to $1.2 million for an intestine transplant, according to consulting firm Milliman. Neither donors nor their families can be paid for organs.
It is possible that not being a donor on your license can give you more bargaining power. If you leave instructions with your next of kin, they can perhaps negotiate a better deal. Instead of just the usual icewater-in-the-ears, why not ask for a blood-flow study to make sure your cortex is truly out of commission?
And how about some anesthetic? Although he doesn't believe the brain dead feel pain, Dr. Truog has used two light anesthetics, high-dose fentanyl and sufentanil, which won't harm organs, to quell high blood pressure or heart rate during harvesting operations. "If it were my family," he said, "I'd request them."
—Mr. Teresi is the author of "The Undead: Organ Harvesting, the Ice-Water Test, Beating-Heart Cadavers—How Medicine Is Blurring the Line Between Life and Death."
A version of this article appeared March 10, 2012, on page C3 in some U.S. editions of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: What You Lose When You Sign That Donor Card.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Once again, random number generation gets unwanted attention

Researchers have published a paper showing that RSA public key encryption is vulnerable to de-encryption by hackers.

 

The RSA algorithm requires a user first to create and publish the product of two large prime numbers, in addition to another number, to generate a public “key.”   To encrypt the message, a second user applies a formula containing that public number.  

 

For the RSA system to work, two large prime numbers must be generated randomly.  Researchers discovered that in a small number of cases, the random number generation failed to work as intended.

 

How many cases?  Very few.  Nothing to lose sleep over.  Out of a sampled population of 7.1 million public keys used to secure e-mail, online banking, and other secure data exchanges, less than one-half of 1% (27,000) provided no real security.  So, that's around 99.8% of the public keys which were safe.

 

What to take away from all this?  This reinforces the notion that it's just a matter of time before any given security algorithm becomes useless.  One day in the deep future (3+ years), if you're still using RSA, you hopefully we will be using 4096-bit encryption along with a lot of other layers of security (or another type of encryption algorithm instead, a la D-H).

 

The RSA algorithm for encryption is in varying bit-lengths, from RSA-100 to RSA-4096.  Anything less than 1024-bit length encryption is not considered secure.  Some suggest even now that 1024-bit encryption is vulnerable to factorization. 

What is factorization?  In number theory, prime factorization is the decomposition of a composite number into smaller non-trivial divisors, which when multiplied together equal the original integer.  If you can figure-out the factorization of a very large number, you can break encryption.

 

Again, there's not too much to worry about, in my opinion.  I do think it's a good opportunity for organizations to review what type of encryption standards they're using, to make sure they're at least within the bell curve of adequacy (e.g., 1024-bit RSA or better, or an encryption algorithm like Diffie-Hellman [D-H] key exchange).

 

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/15/technology/researchers-find-flaw-in-an-online-encryption-method.html?_r=2&hpw


--------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom this email is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and deleting this email from your computer. Nothing contained in this email or any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for contract formation or constitute an electronic signature.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

God Bless You, Mr. Renoir

For those of you (like myself) who grew up hearing Mozart for the first time while watching Saturday morning Bugs Bunny cartoons; whose subsequent exposure to Night Court in the 1980s inured you to the notion that Casablanca, memorable and great as it was, and still is, was the ultimate in cinema; who went to college and then to work and then found yourself forty-something in the 21st century; who forgot how to appreciate art; hear this: let us all thank the gods at NBC for putting the Criterion Collection on Hulu Plus.  

Several years ago I bought a few DVD titles from the Criterion Collection off Amazon.  This would have been circa 2004.  Wild Strawberries, Seven Samurai, The Strange Object of Desire.  Incredibly potent films, worth savoring every frame.  

But I lost interest in trying to amass a whole collection; and, besides, I didn't really know which ones were truly worth buying and learning about.  Fast forward a few years.  The Intarwebs give birth to Hulu.  And then to Hulu Plus. By 2011, the Criterion Collection is entirely available, online, on-demand, via an $8.95 subscription to Hulu Plus.  This is what we've been waiting for.  This is as good as it gets, kids.

Finally, I work my into an allotment of time for Seventh Seal.  Stunning.  From there, l'avventura, a film my daughter actually said was fantastic.  Onward to La jetee.  And then Jean Renoir.  I remember hearing some fragment in my brain from an episode of Siskel and Ebert.  How else to explain the familiarity of the title, Boudu Saved from Drowning.  And then, the next night, The Rules of the Game.  Both made on the eve of WWII.  Just try watching these two films and not forget that you're watching something from the 1930s.  By comparison, nearly every contemporary American film seems stiff, tinny.  Yes, we all know how Down and All in Beverly Hills remade the basic story of Boudu.  But to see it made for the first time, to see Michel Simon doing his tramp thing (far more real and bitingly funny than Chaplin), I think I understand now why Cannes is held in Cannes.  France, before the war, dominated cinema.  Thank you, Mr. Renoir.  Thank you, Mr. Kilar (Hulu CEO).

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

How to Continue Using Wikipedia

Sorry Jimmy, I agree that SOPA is stupid, but I needs my Wikipedia (knows-all-tells-all).  So, for all of you who can't bear another hour not being able to lookup an entry, here's what you can do:

 

1. go to www.goosh.org and type wiki <enter>

2. type the Wikipedia entry you're looking for.

3. click on the link.

4. before the link stops loading, just stop the browser.  In some browsers, this is just "ctrl+." [period].  In others, it's just clicking on "X" in the URL window bar.

5. I guess Wikipedia isn't being too hard core about this.  They're not really blocking access to their site, so much as putting in a somewhat ineffective (and slow) redirect.

 

Happy hunting.

 


--------------------------

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this message may be proprietary and/or confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom this email is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this email and deleting this email from your computer. Nothing contained in this email or any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for contract formation or constitute an electronic signature.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

MLK Day

Martin Luther King Day.  January 16th, 2012.  Actually, his birthday was yesterday.  Rolled over when the 8:30am alarm went off.  Obviously, not working today.  Only the 2nd MLK Day I've enjoyed having off, ever (been working at a bank since 2010).  Finally got up around 9:00am so I could take a call at 9:30am from Bryan University, a for-profit university down in SoCal, the premiere paralegal institution in the country.  I'm trying to get on their adjunct faculty staff.  The call went well, I'm probably going to be teaching something IT related in March.   

Got Saskia up.  Fed her.  Bitched at her.  Confiscated her iPhone.  Apologized.  Made-up.  She's 12, in case you're wondering.  Finally got out of the house, drove to Half-Priced Books in Everett, WA.  Bought a 40-lb, 80-book-stuffed cardboard box for $10 full of children's books.  Went to DQ and force-fed said 12 year old some semblance of nourishment.  Hey, I'm a dad.  She can eat vege when her mom gets home.  After lunch, prodded 12 year-old to locate nearest women's shelter on her iPhone, which she did.  Drove around in circles in downtown Everett for 30 minutes until we zeroed-in on the Everett Mission: a nondescript row of obviously-city-built houses on 2nd Avenue in the Lowell neighborhood of South Everett, just beneath and between Interstate 5 and the Snohomish River.  Found the unmarked women's shelter and parked.  Really pleaded with Saskia to get out of the car and follow me inside, lest I be pepper-sprayed by formerly battered women. Did I mention this was Saskia's idea to begin with?  Dropped-off the 40-lb box of books for children and said a few friendly words with the folks hanging around.  Glad Saskia got to see that.  Those women truly were abiding in a refuge.  I'm sure it made an impression on her, one of those formative memories.  Drove back to upscale Mukilteo and went for a run with the dogs.  And, then later, as in the words of the immortal Samuel Pepys, "and to bed."